SCENT —
K9’s Reason for
Being
Det.
Steve White and Ofc. Tim Tieken
(Ret.) Seattle Police Department
First produced in
1994, updated in 1999
FOREWORD
This document is based in large part on
William Syrotuck’s Scent and The Scenting Dog. It has been compiled with the permission of
the copyright holder, Jean Syrotuck-Whittle. She has graciously given free use of the
material for educational purposes for those who use dogs in public service.
Although nearly 30 years old, many still consider this book the most useful available on scent
work. In terms of information per page, it is unsurpassed. If you don’t own a
copy, buy one and study it thoroughly. Other
portions come from public domain work done by various researchers working under
the auspices of the Department of Defense. Thanks to Doctors Regina Dugans (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), Jim Johnston
(Institute for Biological Detection Systems), and Larry Meyers (
INTRODUCTION
It is common knowledge dogs can follow a
scent trail undetectable to humans. However, a problem arises when we try to
bring this information before a court of law. Courts should not accept evidence
that may be based upon unreliable information. We must be able to describe the
dog’s ability in specific factual terms to be acceptable. At a minimum, every
handler must qualify as an expert witness in the use of his or her dog, otherwise
tracking evidence testimony will inadmissible.
Beyond courtroom purposes it is helpful to understand what the dog does
when managing scent or odor. The dog is unable to
tell us what he or she perceives so we are left to examine whatever evidence we
find. The goal of this class is to help you understand and apply the evidence. Thoughtful application of this material will
improve your training and handling. Understanding
the dog’s ability, and what scent is, it will assist you in reading your dog’s reactions
to the environment. Only then you can assist your dog in solving problems he does
not understand. In short, mastery of this material will make you a better team.
1 THE SENSE OF SMELL
Dogs live in an entirely different scent
world than we do. They are profoundly affected by odors
we can not detect. The dog’s ability to perceive scent is so far beyond human ability
it is difficult for us to comprehend. The dog’s ability to smell compares to
ours like our power of reason compares to his.
In the natural state the dog’s sense of smell, olfaction,
is used to obtain data important to his survival. The smell of a rabbit
stimulates the drive to hunt and therefore nourish himself.
The smell of a female in heat stimulates procreation. The smell of an enemy stimulates
fight or flight behaviors.
The dog learns to pay attention to odors for which he associates negative or positive consequences.
Using this capacity of the dog we can train him to detect odors
we want detected or followed. Generally speaking positive reinforcement and
incentives are used. In nature the dog
may never become interested in these odors, but we
can engineer his experience to modify or shape his behavior
to serve our needs. To do so we must understand the dog’s learning process and
how he perceives scent. The following anatomical information will be helpful
toward this end.
2 ANATOMY AND
PHYSIOLOGY
Understanding the structure and function
of the dog’s olfactory system and how it differs from ours will help in both
training and application of the dog.
Structure and Function
Nasal Plane - The
hairless part of the nose. Serves as the entry way for scent. It controls the size of
the nostril entry passage.
Vomeronasal Organ (VNO) - This organ is not functionally present in the human. (Recent research
brings this statement into question and indicates humans may well have a
functional vomeronasal organ.) In the dog it is a
scent-associated organ located in the roof of the mouth. Nerve fibers connect the vomeronasal gland
directly to the olfactory lobes of the dog’s brain.
Turbinates - These
are bony ridges located inside the nasal passages. They serve several purposes.
They slow the movement of the in-coming air, warm it, moisten it, and spread it
out over the scent reception area of the nasal chamber. The turbinates
are covered with mucous membrane containing the scenting cells.
Sinuses - The sinuses are cavities in the bones
near the muzzle of the dog. They are lined with mucous-like cells that may have
olfactory capability. The exact purpose and function are not known. It is
speculated their purpose is saving scent for comparison or “memory”.
Nerves of Olfaction - These nerves are comparatively large and
very numerous. They connect the
reception cells/sites with the olfactory lobes of the brain.
Nasal Mucosa - A mucous membrane covers the entire
surface of the nasal chambers. The membrane secretes a fluid that serves to
moisten incoming air and the surface of the chambers, and acts as a solvent. It
also traps particles from the air sample. The mucous is produced by goblet
cells.
Olfactory Cells - These cells are critical to the
olfactory process. However, it is not known exactly how they interact with the
scent particles that reach the nose. There are a number of theories. What is
known is that they are present in the nose and linked with the olfactory region
of the brain.
Sustentacular Cells - These cells are present where the
olfactory cells exist. They appear to have a part in the perception of scent.
Some practitioners believe with darker pigmentation do better at scent
perception. The dark color of sustentacular
cells may support this belief, but for Man’s purposes most dog’s
olfactory capacity meets our needs. The sustentacular
cells’ exact role in not completely understood.
Basal Cells - As suggested by their name the basal
cells underlie the sustentacular and olfactory cells.
Their function is not clearly understood.
Comparison of Human vs. Dog
The olfactory system is comprised of the
nasal chambers, receptor cells, olfactory nerves, and the olfactory lobes of
the brain. It is in the olfactory lobes that scent is recognized, processed,
and filed to memory. Almost 12% of the
dog’s brain and 50% of the nasal chambers are devoted to olfaction. In
comparison the olfactory lobes of the human brain are much smaller than the
dog’s. This is also true of the square area of olfactory receptor cells in the human
nasal chambers. In the human this area is about the size of a postage stamp compared
to about one square yard in a German Shepherd dog. The
human receptor site contains approximately 5 million cells where the German Shepherd dog has approximately 220 million cells.
Dividing the 5 million into the 220
million would indicate the dog’s ability to scent is 44 times greater than the
human. However, it may not be that simple. You must take into account the dog
has a larger processing capacity. When the larger processing capacity is
coupled with a data collection system that is 44 times greater the difference
may be an exponential of the 44. Since the dog’s ability to indicate, if not
detect, an odor increases with training this will
also widen the gap between man and dog.
3 THEORIES OF SCENT
The summation of this chapter is that
there is no clear understanding of how the sensation of scent is perceived by
the body. However, there are two general categories of theories: chemical
contact and vibration; both occurring at the molecular level. It must be
emphasized there is no proof of the mechanisms that take place between the
environment and the olfactory system. Although
the mechanism is not understood there is ample empirical data to demonstrate
the dog has a keen sense of smell that is greater than man’s. Although Syrotuck was inclined toward the “Lock and Key” theory,
more recent research lends credence to electro-chemical theories.
4 THE HUMAN BODY AS A SCENT SOURCE
As a person walks through the
environment he leaves a scent-trail. That scent-trail is unique to the
track-layer. This chapter examines evidence left behind as a person passes-by.
Heredity - It is now a well-known fact that a persons genetic make-up is unique to each individual. If we
can collect a person’s DNA from a crime scene we can later have it matched to
that person much in the same way that a fingerprint is matched to a specific
person.
Health and State of
Racial Variations - There are several differences in the
structures and secretions of different races. For example the oriental race has
fewer sweat glands than Caucasian or blacks and the earwax secretions of the
races are different. Scout dogs in
Cultural and Dietary Variation - The foods we eat, the clothes we wear,
cosmetics, and the things we handle all have an effect on our odor.
Cells and Skin - Each
cell of the body contains the genetic make-up of the person and the by-products
of the person’s food and environment. The
skin of a person contains glands that deposit, body chemistry on the skin.
These by-products of the glands are individual to the person. Toiletries and other products in the person’s
environment also contaminate skin.
Eccrine Sweat Gland - These glands cover the entire body. Their primary purpose is thermoregulation
of the body. Heat is the primary stimulus to activate these glands. However, emotional stress may also activate
them.
Apocrine Sweat Glands - Apocrine sweat glands are located at the base of
hair follicles in particular areas, such the arm pits, genitalia, and around
the nipples, anus, and navel. These
glands are specialized and trigger upon emotional responses such as fear. The components
of apocrine sweat are produced differently than eccrine sweat and tend to be much more odorous.
Hair follicle and Sebaceous Gland - All hair follicles have an associated
sebaceous gland. There are also sebaceous glands that open directly to the
skin. They are most prominent on the face, scalp, and upper torso. The
secretions of the sebaceous glands are fatty oils. The secretion is called
sebum and it spreads over the skin, mixing with other skin secretions.
Toiletries - Each product that is used on the human
body carries its own scent from its chemical make-up. These products also effect the bacterial colonies that reside on and in the
skin. Some of the antiperspirants block the flow of perspiration. Some are
antibacterial.
Inhabitants - Each human has colonies of bacteria
living on and in their skin. There are
also other living organisms such as mites, fungi, yeasts and viruses. The bacterial colonies are by far the most
common and plentiful. Each person has more than one type of bacteria residing
on their skin. Each colony has a different population density. Each type of
bacteria affects the host in a different way. Bacteria eat the nutrients of the skin. Some
are specific to the type of food they eat, others are not. As the bacteria eat
the nutrients of the skin cells and skin secretions they
breakdown the nutrients and produce gaseous
by-products. These by-products are available to the dog. Since the bacteria are
acting upon the specific make-up of the host the by-product is specific to the
host and the concentration of bacteria, which further individualizes the scent
to that person. This is so because each person has different types and
concentrations of bacteria. It is
estimated that skin has almost the same bacterial content as soil. The varying combinations
by subspecies and population densities could account for most individual variations.
When these organisms interact with the genetically varied by-products of the host
body, even more individuality occurs. Bacterial
activity is affected by several factors:
Temperature - Each bacterium has its own growth rate
temperature preference. Universally
lower temperatures retard activity. As the temperature rises to the maximum
growth range the colony flourishes and then dies off rapidly as the temperature
goes past the maximum growth range.
Humidity - Each cell is comprised of about 80%
water. Without water the cell cannot survive. As the humidity of the
environment decreases so does the growth rate of the bacterium.
Light - Bacteria are susceptible to ultra-violet
light.
Chemical Agents - Each product that a person comes into
contact with becomes a part of their clothing or person. This additional odor assists the dog in individualizing a person by scent.
All of these things add to our odor and tend to individualize us. The dog is capable of smelling
these differences and recognizing the combination.
5 TRANSMISSION
The previous chapter expressed the
source of individual scent. This chapter describes the transmission of that
scent to the environment where it is available to the dog.
Rafts
- The epidermal layers of the human skull
is constantly replenishing itself, because a skin cells life span is about 36
hours. As the cells age they flatten into a flake.
They are then shed from the body. Some fall from the body by themselves and
others are shed fixed to one or more other cells. The discarded cells are
called “rafts”. Each raft carries the genetic make-up of the person,
secretions, toiletries, etc. The rafts also carry microbial passengers that
continue to feed on the nutrients of the rafts producing a cloud of by-products
around each raft. The average raft is
.014mm in diameter, and weighs approximately .07 micrograms (.0000000245 oz.).
Rafts are shed at a rate of approximately 40,000 cells per minute, or 50
Million per day. Skin rafts are the most common component of house dust.
Body Air Current - The human body is usually in an air mass
cooler than itself. The body is heating the air adjacent to itself. The heated
air rises along the surfaces of the body at a rate of approximately 1.5 miles
per hour (a slow walk). As the heated air rises it carries rafts along. As the
heated air clears the body it is caught in the wind. Some rafts are less aerodynamic than others
and fall to earth sooner than aerodynamic rafts. Rafts are also expelled from the lungs and
upper respiratory tract in the same manner and exhaled into the atmosphere. As rafts disperse into the atmosphere they
spread and fall to earth where they are caught in cracks and crevices. The
rafts continue to produce scent as long as the moisture and nutrients last,
which will be determined by the environmental conditions. The dispersion of rafts can be visualized by
picturing a man throwing handfuls of flour into the air as he walks along. The
flour will be separated by the air and fall to earth as individual grains or in
small clumps. The breadth of the dispersal will depend upon the velocity of the
wind and the velocity of the track-layer. The velocities will effect the density (rafts per area) of the particles.
6 ATMOSPHERIC FACTORS AND AIRBORNE SCENT
While we are discussing this chapter
keep in mind that there is a narrow focus on airborne scent. In the next
segment we will discuss ground scent and in the following segment how the two
blend.
Wind - If wind were a constant movement of air
in one direction at a steady velocity it would be simple to project where the
rafts and other spoor would likely come to rest: They would be down stream from the source. The heavier rafts falling close to the source while lighter ones
drift farther away. The distance the rafts travel from the source is directly
related to wind speed. This phenomenon
is now known as the Scent Plume. It is so called because it tends to be narrow near the
source and to widen with curling tendrils farther downwind. These tendrils vary
in density and proximity to teach other, so it is entirely possible for there
to be near complete gaps of “scentless” air between them. For this reason the
plume metaphor is more accurate than the cone used in the past. The movement of air is affected by many
factors, which is a study in itself. However, the following principles apply as
you analyze a scent problem.
7 THE GROUND SCENT PICTURE
When a person walks through an area he
leaves two types of evidence: 1) the airborne rafts and other debris coming to rest on the ground, and 2)
the physical disturbance of the earth as the result of footfalls. The
combination of the two is called the ground scent picture.
The Footstep -
As a person steps onto the ground the
soil is compressed and rearrange according to the makeup and condition of the
soil. Any vegetation caught in this action may be crushed. Soil is heavily contaminated with bacteria.
As the soil is disturbed by the footfall the habitat of the bacteria is
altered. Bacteria not previously exposed to light or moisture may now be. The
disturbance may increase or decrease bacterial activity. This represents a change from the surrounding
area. It becomes a slue to the dog. The
chemistry of the soil will be exposed by the footfall bringing about additional
change. The crushed vegetation will
expose nutrients to be acted upon by bacteria. The process of putrefaction will
begin. Bacteria in the soil will
breakdown vegetable and animal matter. This process will be ongoing when the
footfall occurs. The by-products of putrefaction will be more exposed to the
atmosphere by the disturbance. As the
shoe or foot strikes the earth there will be an exchange of matter from one to the
other. In this way scent from the person will be directly deposited on the footstep.
This scent may contain the person’s individual scent from his perspiration and
contaminates from his environment and the shoe chemistry. The more vegetable matter in the soil when
moisture is present the more bacteria will be present. When there is less nutrients available there will be less bacteria. When there is no moisture present, bacteria
will be less active.
Rafts On The Ground - When a raft falls to the ground resident
bacteria will be affected by the new environment. If the
location is shaded from direct sunlight and has sufficient moisture and
tolerable temperature, the bacteria will continue to thrive as long as the
nutrients last. If the raft falls
where the temperature, ultra-violet light and/or moisture are not conducive the
bacterial activity will decrease or stop depending upon the severity of the
conditions. The raft that lands on a
hot concrete road on a mid-summer day will not last long. If the raft were to
land in the same place in pre-dawn dew it may thrive for an extended time.
8 ANALYSIS OF THE GROUND SCENT PICTURE
Three things occur when a foot
impression is made: a release of vegetative fluids rafts coming to rest on the
ground, and the bacterial decomposition of the exposed plant cells. The rafts may be separate from the actual
footfall.
Ground disturbance - Absent vegetation, each foot fall still
results in changes in the ground surface. Bacteria are disturbed, soil may be
uncovered, and there is transference of shoe or foot material to ground.
Vegetative fluids - Each foot fall on any form of plant life
results in damage to the plant, and a resulting immediate release of odiferous vegetative fluids. This produces an initial burst
of odor, which dissipates quickly as the fluids
evaporate.
Vegetative Putrefaction - After plants are crushed by footfalls,
they begin to decay as they are consumed by bacteria. This decay produces odor, which varies with time, type of plant, types of
bacteria, and environmental conditions. Human
scent - Some skin rafts fall close to footfalls, whiles others fall relatively
far away. Human by product vapors.
Time - Time is an important factor: the scent
components will develop and diminish at different times. The scent picture is
ever changing. When the rafts fall they are active. Conditions as described earlier will dictate
their activity level and duration. As soon as the vegetable matter is crushed
the odor of the plant chemistry will be present and
in the same way the conditions will dictate how long and how strong the odor will be present.
The strength and timing of the different components of the scent picture
will not necessarily coincide. The odor left by the
shoe or foot may well last the longest and at the same time be the faintest.
Bacterial odors may rise and fall with the moisture
or the temperature. A point to remember
is the track will be different from the ambient area. This in itself is a clue
to the dog. However, the degree to which he can differentiate one track from another is
another question. That will be determined by the presence of the components
that individualize scent.
9 WORKING DOGS ON SCENT
For the purposes of this class we need
to define some term so that we are talking the same language.
Tracking Dog - A purist tracking dog is one that is
trained to follow the track foot step to foot step. This dog stays close to the
actual path the tracklayer traveled and does not pay
attention to the scent that is available down wind from the track. This dog
tracks at a slower pace and keeps his head down sniffing the ground. He is the stereotyped
bloodhound type tracker as seen in movies.
Trailing Dog - The trailing dog is oriented to the
scent particles that have settled down wind from the track and pays little
attention to the ground-borne scent at the foot impressions. He typically
travels faster than the purist tracker and keeps his nose off the ground most
of the time.
Air Scent Dog - This dog works the scent from the still
airborne rafts and the gas cloud that accompanies the rafts that have recently
fallen to the ground. He casts back and forth with his nose high in the air
searching for scent. This type of dog may well ignore the ground scent picture.
The
point of this chapter is one of learning to which evidence you should orient
your dog. The key to the answer of where
the dog should be oriented is to analyze what evidence will be most available
to the dog during his average search. From
the perspective of time delay between the tracklayer’s departure and the dog’s
start the air scenting dog would be the first dog to use. If the average track
is one of short to moderate delay then the trailing dog would be the better
option. If your average delay is longer, then a purist tracker would be better
suited to fill your needs. On the other hand if the delay is so long that the
track is no longer workable, or a starting point on the track is unknown then
the air scenting dog applied as a area search would be
a better option. Dogs are never truly
oriented completely to one type of scent to the exclusion of all others. Each
dog becomes oriented according to his experience and natural propensity. The important thing is to determine what kind
of training you need to produce the most appropriate skills in the dog.
Environment
- Humidity and temperature will also play
a role in this decision. In areas where there is little vegetation or moisture
and often has high temperatures tracking dogs are not likely to be very
successful. In this circumstance a trailing dog may be the best option if not
an air scenting dog. The same would be true in an inner city with a high population
density and mostly covered with pavement. In these circumstances it would be best
to judiciously apply an air scenting dog.
10 SNOW
Dogs can track in snow. Their ability to
do so depends on their training, the condition of the snow, and temperature. In
fact, there are many trainers who advocate initial training for tracking dogs occur in snow to minimize the vegetative component of the
scent picture. The primary evidence
available to the dog is the rafts left by the track-layer. It is therefore
advisable to orient the dog towards this type of evidence. Since snow temperature is low the bacteria
activity level is low. The low level of available scent is difficult for the
dog to detect. However, this is mitigated by the otherwise sterile environment
so the dog will not have as many or as strong of scents from which to sort the
proper odor. The
consistency of snow is different. Generally speaking new snow and colder snow
has a low specific gravity and therefore more air is in the snow and flowing
through the snow. Conversely, warmer snow is denser and contains less air.
In most instances the ground below snow
is warmer than the snow. This creates a rising movement of the air within the
snow. This current will transport rafts and/or vapor
to the surface of the snow. A person buried in snow is warmer than the snow
even after death. This temperature
difference will cause the scent to rise to the surface. There is one case in
11 EXPERIMENTS
Austrian experiment - A track was laid with a series of 90 turns.
After the fourth turn the track-layer was suspended 15’ off the ground and
deposited back on the ground several hundred feet later, where upon he
completed two more legs of the track. Tracking dogs were unable to complete the
track. The experiment was repeated with the suspended tracklayer leaving impressions
on the ground with a 150 pound wheel with artificial “feet.” The tracking dog
completed the track “successfully.” From
these results, the originators of this experiment concluded that there was no individual
human scent, and that tracking dogs followed only the ground disturbance created
by the tracklayer’s passing. However, since that time others (including Syrotuck and SPD) have achieved very different results in
similar experiments using dogs trained to rely on the human component of the
scent picture.
Double V experiment - Two track-layers of equal weight laid
tracks configured as opposing Vs, meeting at the apex of the Vs before turning 90 away from each other. Dogs trained to track only ground disturbance
failed to negotiate the turns, and continued straight along the second
tracklayer’s route as if it was the first’s. If the
weight of the tracklayers varied by 25% or more, some tracking dogs were able
to follow the first tracklayer’s path. Again, the experiment designers reached
the conclusion that there was no individual human scent, and that the dogs’
correct discrimination was based on the difference in ground disturbance
created by the tracklayers of different weights. Syrotuck and others
have since found that properly trained trailing dogs successfully negotiate
such turns and discriminate correctly regardless of the weight of the
tracklayers.
Copyright 2002 Steve White and Tim Tieken. ptswhite@charter.net
All rights reserved. “Every handler gets the dog he deserves.” Motto:
RAF K9