OF PEAS AND PUPS

PART V

MUTATIONS

The duplicating properties of the Chromosomes and Genes are of considerable consistency. This consistency makes the application of the laws of heredity practical. Occasionally, as with all things, there is a slip-up. A gene 'GOOFS' OR 'IS GOOFED' by some quirk....by some chemical change.....When this happens a MUTATION is said to have taken place. It is the sudden abrupt change in a gene from one Allelic Form to another. It is not necessarily accompanied by an "explosion" as indicated in figure 22.

Figure 22

Most Mutations are recessive and harmful. When a mutation takes place in a Germ Cell (a FUNCTIONAL SPERMATOZOON OR OVUM) it follows heredity trails. Since Recessives must usually come in pairs to show, it may be generations before finding a mate...either of its own making or the same mutation which developed in another animal of the same species....It differs from a "throw back" in that the new gene was not formerly in the breed. Even, a Dominant Mutation may not make itself known since its effect may range from lethal to zero.

Horns in cattle are normal...hornless or polled a Mutation. The stubby legs of the badger-digging Dachshund are thought to be of mutant origin and dominant. The wirelike hair of many breeds is thought to have resulted from a mutation and I too, is dominant. In this latter regard, we do not infer that the GWP was once a GSP one of whose w's mutated to W. A guess would be that the mutation occurred in some early dog species, possible now extinct and probably not too remote from the wolf.

The practical value to the dog breeder for his awareness of mutations is limited; however, should you have a Shorthair Pup, pop up without dew claws or with his tail naturally the proper length, DON'T drown him....Platinum in mink was the first of the mutation mink to handsomely reward their breeders with gold. it arose as a recessive (in the USA and also later in Norway) and by inbreeding, a true breeding strain was developed. Had the mink breeder, who first found a platinum kit in his litter destroyed it, it is impossible to estimate how many pretty platinum-blonde mistresses would have had "goose pimples" on their tender-soft white shoulders for lack of a warm mutant mink stole. Such a tragedy tears at the heart-strings of the most calloused of men.

Mutations occur constantly in nature but at a rather slow rate; one popping up somewhere in 100,000 to 1,000,000 gene generations. In spite of this more than 600 mutations are known in the fruit fly alone but many of them have been artificially produced for study....Artificially they may be induced by radiation, extreme temperature changes, chemical agents and the like.

Mutations which produce great and obvious changes...wirehair, stubby legs, polled cattle...are few and far between. I know of no such in the GSP. Yet at the rate that mutations are known to take place many have occurred in our breed "since Hektor was a pup" (HEKTOR 1, VOL.1, GSP STUDBOOK WHELPED 1886). It is altogether possible that as a result of mutations in many minor genes, the cumulative effects may have been more significant to the breed than is realized. After discussing the qualitative characteristics in Part V!, it may become obvious how this could be possible. many of the great changes wrought by nature through the ages have come about by these minute variations at these tremendous odds. Among bacteria which may produce a new generation in a matter of minutes, mutations are more obvious. Their interest to man and beast rests not alone in their demonstration of evolutionary processes but more especially in their practical effects.

Let assume that you or your pup, have a bacterial infection. That an antibiotic has been prescribed to be taken over a five day period. By the second day much improvement is noted and the medication stopped. On the fourth day, the condition returns and medication is resumed...but this time the condition does not improve. What has happened? The bacteria are now resistant to that drug. A MUTANT STRAIN HAS DEVELOPED.

In the laboratory it is possible to develop (breed) strains which can resist concentrations of antibacterial agents many times stronger than those which would kill the original strain. This is accomplished by gradually increasing the concentration until a mutation has occurred which thrives in this environment. When this strain becomes well established the concentration is again increased, presenting this new strain with circumstances under which they barely survive until another mutation develops which thrives in this newer environment. This process is continued until it can be pushed no farther or until resistance to the desired concentration has been reached....It is interesting that the mutated strain will not survive under the original circumstances. it is not surprising, however, since it is improbable that many animals on earth today, including man, could survive the living conditions which existed when they first appeared on the early geologic horizon. Basically, this is the process of evolution and since evolving a better Shorthair is our goal, there is a message here.....

 

If the "bacteria breeder" (we are all bacteria breeders, like it or not) sets as his goal or ideal an "animal" which lives, multiplies and flourishes in a specific environment, he reaches that goal by gradual scientifically planned steps, which the dog breeder would do well to emulate. both breeders are using variations for progress. The "steps" graphing the progress of the bacteria breeder might look something like this...(Figure 23)

Figure 23

The dog breeder, on the other hand, usually presents a graph which looks more like the Down-Jones averages...not very constant or rapid, with many set-backs but still, one which always shows some progress over the long haul...(Figure 24)

 

Figure 24

 

Why crawl when you can run? Means are available, if we will but use them, to push progress at three at three or four times its present rate. The dog breeder will more closely match the steady upward advance of the bacteria breeder if he, too, sets a definite and positive goal and makes specific step by step plans to reach that goal. if he line breeds to the best until something better comes along and then line breeds to that. WE will have more to say about that later.

HYBRID VIGOR

Unfortunately, we have all seen Weimaraner-Shorthair and/or lab-Shorthair crosses. Often they are fine rugged looking animals with considerable natural ability in the field. Such cross-breeding exhibits what is called HYBRID VIGOR OR HETEROSIS. The F1's are superior to either P1. The mule which results from the crossing of horse and as is the classical example of this phenomenon. Their vigor is historic, yet, they are rarely fertile....Corn production has greatly increased by the use of hybrid seed. The seed results from the crossing (hybridizing) of two strongly inbred strains of corn. The benefits of the hybrid seed fall off sharply in subsequent generations. "Nik-chiks", a trade name, for a line of baby chicks, are strong, disease resistant, fast growing, heavy-meated birds, which are produced by this genetic process. The only way to get more "chicks which 'nicked'" is to repeat the original crossings which produced the first ones. They cannot reproduce themselves...The same genetic mechanism which is thought to produce this HETEROSIS functions in the same manner within a breed. The results are not often quite so drastic since the genetic differences are not quite so diverse.

The three terms, HYBRID VIGOR, HETEROSIS AND NICKING are often used interchangeably. The results are that the offspring are superior to the parents. Whatever improvements, is for the F1 only, it contributes little to overall breed improvement. it is thought that each parent has some gaps in their double genetic necklace. When the strands are separated at MEIOSIS (FIG 7 REDUCTION DIVISION) and rejoined in fertilization, the recessive leaks o fth one, are filled by the dominant plugs of the other, so that no Double Recessives exist to fault the Phenotype. Although not completely understood, the genetic picture is thought to look much like....(Figure 25)

Figure 25

The pups have no chance of reproducing their own excellence...breed them and see.....They will slip right back into the trough of mediocrity with their parents, if they do not slip over the edge and drop down into the gutter. Such pups, must be most carefully assayed before breeding. The diversity of their origins should raise serious suspicions as to their prepotency..."NICKING" can, and usually does, present the same genetic picture, yet it could present a picture like FRANZ (the black beads are considered incomplete dominants)..(Figure 26)

Figure 26

ERBA AND EIFER 'NICKED' TO PRODUCE FRANZ. He is better than either of them. No Hybrid vigor or Heterosis can account for him. he is not HYBRID-anything or HETERO-anything...He is Homozygotic dominant. He is therefore inbred and prepotent. FLOR is not superior to her parents Phenotypically or Genotypically. I have failed to find in the literature a discussion of the differences which may exist in these three terms. I submit that the difference illustrated is one and, although rare, can exist. Another is this...the improvement of pups over parents can be the result of an Epistatic effect (A gene that alters either direction or intensity of another gene) which is not thought to be the case in Hybrid Vigor or Heterosis. Epistasis, as we have said, is not well understood. We will have to await further knowledge of individual gene action. When and if such knowledge does become available, it may lend further impetus to the breeding which follows. Meanwhile, DO NOT be led astray by the all-knowing character who maintains that knowledge of individual gene action is essential to the practical use of Mendelism. THE IGNORANCE OF SUCH A ONE DOES A GREAT DISSERVICE TO BREED BETTERMENT.

REVERSION

THROW BACK. ATAVISM AND REVERSION REFERS TO THE APPEARANCE IN A PUP OF SOME HEREDITARY CHARACTERISTIC WHICH DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE PARENTS AND MAY NOT HAVE APPEARED IN THE BREED OR STRAIN FOR MANY GENERATIONS......Like the smoothhair which is said to occasionally crop up among Wirehairs. Long considered some mysterious trick of fate, Father Mendels gift of knowledge makes it all clear now....in fact, there is no reasonable explanation without that knowledge....

Recessives must come in pairs to show. A single recessive (like a mutation) may ramble through the generations for ages before finding a mate, particulary if that specific gene is rare in the breed. The longer it remains hidden, of course, the less likely it is to ever come to the surface. Even if fate joins a sire and dam each carrying the same recessive, it will show up only once out of four pups and in an individual mating it might not even show up at all....If "Aa" and "Aa" did mate and not show an "aa" pup, they would scatter enough "a's" around that you can rest assured that they would pop up sooner or later and probably sooner....Recessives are always at the root of these throw backs. Usually it is a Double recessive, as above, occasionally a single. A Single Recessive acting with an incomplete dominant "Aa" can produce an effect not present in either parent, "AA" or "aa"....:Aa" pups cannot breed true but must be reproduced each time by "AA" - "aa" parents, while "AA" and "aa" pups will duplicate themselves with ease. This merely demonstrates again the importance of Genetic Purity....HOMOZYGOSIS.

GENE FREQUENCY

As the name implies GENE FREQUENCY refers to how often a specific gene appears, or is present, in a give population, in a particular breed. One member of an Allelic pair may be rarer or more abundant than its partner. The gene for liver, E, in the GSP has frequency of 1, because it is present in every member of the breed, as is the K for short hair. If the gene for black, B, is no longer present in the breed, that gene has a frequency of 0-. If there are still some blacks in the breed, as we hear-tell, then the B is not zero, but approaching it....The frequency of the recessives which might produce Throw-Backs are approaching that "goose egg". The appearance of a black Shorthair from non-black parents is naturally, an impossibility. If you see such a one you can be sure that both parents were not Shorthairs...contrary to what the guy says....

The object of the game is to increase the Frequency of Desirable Genes to 1, where they will stay (barring a mutation) and to decrease the Frequency of the undesirable genes to zero, where they too will stay, HOMOZYGOSIS, the greatest single factor for gene betterment, presents genes with no other frequency than 1.0.

PREPOTENCY

The purpose of this series is to stimulate thought as well as to inform. With this in mind, read carefully the following....A DOG NEED NOT BE INBRED TO BE GREAT, BUT HE MUST BE INBRED TO BE A GREAT SIRE.....Repeat...."HE MUST BE INBRED TO BE A GREAT SIRE" - TO BE PREPOTENT.....

This may call for a reversal of our thinking, yet it is fact not fantasy. Such a statement will be challenged only by one who has made No Effort to understand the workings of the genetic system; or one who considers the pedigree the sole guide to dog breeding. We shall discuss it in more detail under "Relationship" and "Breeding Plans" which will follow later.

Returning to our "beads for genes", we find two pups with pretty near the same ability...the same Phenotype. ARTIG is a great dog, a great sire and inbred....AXEL is also a great dog, but a poor sire and is outbred. When we say one is inbred and the other outbred we are not looking at any pedigrees, we are looking at the Genotype....the only positive way to know what we are doing...we are looking at our beads for genes... (Figure 27)

Figure 27

THE PURPOSE OF INBREEDING, is to bring like gens from the male and female Gametes to the zygote. In so far as this is accomplished, inbreeding has take place...pedigrees to the contrary notwithstanding. So ARTIG is inbred even though his sire and dam are no closer related, in the pedigree, than fourth cousins twice removed by marriage. AXEL is outbred though his father and mother be half-sibs.

PREPOTENCY is the ability of an animal (sire or dam) to stamp its seal upon its offspring...TO CAUSE THE PUPS TO LOOK AND/OR ACT MORE LIKE THE PREPOTENT PARENT THAN THE OTHER PARENT.....Although prepotency for dominant faults is possible, we shall consider only prepotency for good here...the mechanism is the same in both cases. The prepotent sire can contribute more to the breed than can the prepotent dam, merely because of the difference in the reproductive potentials of male and female. It can be rightly said, however, that a prepotent bitch, properly handled, can offer more to the breed than the greatest sire ever whelped...handled as most such sires are handled....Still thought to be some mysterious quirk by many, prepotency is today pretty well understood by geneticists and thoughtful breeders everywhere. There are two prime factors involved...Dominance and Homozygosity....Both factors can be controlled by the genetic tools available to the average breeder. These tools are selection and inbreeding...Both tools are without value, in building or maintaining prepotency, if they are not used together. We will have more to say about them in a future installment.

PREPOTENCY is a matter of Homozygous Dominance...it is therefore, also a matter of degree, COMPLETE PREPOTENCY IS IMPOSSIBLE. Complete Homozygosity is next to impossible (Remember 103000) and complete dominance, even if possible, is not desirable in the GSP. Complete prepotency for good is impossible because some of our desirable characteristics are Recessive and No Animal can stamp another with a recessive trait, good or bad. "It takes two to Tango." We often hear how some outstanding specimen of the breed passed his prepotency on to his sons, grandsons or even his great grandsons. It sounds good, it makes a great story, BUT, it has no basis in fact. Think! Are we going back to the old "sire only" theory? PREPOTENCY IS NOT HEREDITARY....IT CANNOT BE TRANSFERRED FROM PREPOTENT PARENT TO OFFSPRING....The prepotent characteristics are passed on to the pups, sure, because it takes only one dominant to show. But it takes Two Dominants for Prepotency. Single Dominants would show up in but half the pups in F2, if there were no Inbreeding....PREPOTENCY IS THE ABILITY TO TRANSMIT. IT IS NOT THE VIRTUES THEMSELVES. So, the sons of the prepotent sire did not receive any Homozygosity from him. If indeed they are Homozygous, he gave his full measure, one-half, and their dam "nicked" with him to supply the other half. No parent however prepotent or homozygous can contribute more than a single gene to any Allelic Pair!

 

ARTIG (meaning good, well-mannered) is prepotent for these six genes (out of 10,000 pair). ZART (meaning frail or fragile) is a genetic blank (for these genes). This is an Outbreeding, a Hybridization because it brings Unlike Genes together in the fertilized egg. (Figure 28)

 

DAX AND DAGMAR are prepotent. They were built by line-breeding (inbreeding) to ARTIG who is prepotent. Inbreeding the "D" litter would make prepotency heredity because BOTH parents are prepotent...homozygous dominant, and this is a pretty rare occurrence. The homozygosity is a long difficult condition to evolve. Once built, it can be totally wrecked in one outbreeding. No one would claim, least of all this author, that prepotency is as easily built or so simply maintained, as Figure 28 would indicate, yet, this is the process....This is exactly, the way the genes operate, AND this is exactly the way the genes must be held together, if the breed is to gain.

 

Take BANNING in F1 (Fig. 28) and breed here to AXEL (Fig. 27), then breed that F2 to a gene string of your own imagination. Do a little crossing over, if you wish. See how rapidly that pretty black double strand necklace of ARTIG'S goes to pot.....Not also, how the outbreeding of ARTIG to ZART diminished his homozygosity to zero. The dominance is still there but the homozygosity is gone.....Restoring it is not easy.

Figure 28

 

 

 

These is only one way to build homozygosity and that is through Inbreeding....The longer inbreeding is continued or the closer the Genetic Relationship of the mates; the greater the Homozygosity. Greater homozygosity means greater prepotency....Of course it goes without saying that it is necessary to start with Superior Genetic Material. The most reliable guide to the prepotency of any individual, before breeding, is his COEFFICIENT OF INBREEDING (FX). This figure gives us the probable percentage of homozygosity, above the breed average, for that individual. We will explain how this figure is obtained and give its practical value in the section of this series covering "Breeding Plans".

It is often said, in fact we have said in this series, that it makes no difference to whom the prepotent sire is bred all his puppies will be great. This is stretching a point. The prepotent sire, because he is not completely homozygous, will usually produce better pups, and pups which probably possess a greater degree of prepotency themselves, when he is mated with a superior bitch of his own strain, than when he is mated to an equally superior bitch from another strain. It is a matter of degree. The pure bred dog will be prepotent over the mongrel.

Usually the prepotent sire is bred far and wide, but rarely is any thought given to returning his daughters and granddaughters to him for service....Most times, when these fine pups have reached mating age, their owners study with great diligence their pedigrees....WHY IS THIS CAREFUL STUDY APPLIED? Simply, to be sure that no animal on it will be used as a sire, Oh, they are not all like that. Some, the bolder ones, might dare to select a male, sight unseen, from the fifth or sixth generation of that pedigree. And, if the pups turn out poorly they'll blame it on inbreeding degeneration. The fact of the matter is this...."RAPID PROGRESS IN ANIMAL BREEDING WILL HAVE TO WAIT ON THE INTELLIGENT USE OF INBREEDING" BREEDING & IMPROVEMENT IN FARM ANIMALS, Rice & Andrews (McGraw-Hill NYC 1951)

Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Corrections to Part 12 & 13

Copyright  2001.  Dr. James G. McCue, Jr.   All rights reserved.  Postscript:  And his legacy lives on in the German Shorthaired Pointers of today.  May they always be healthy and bred with forethought and planning.

  Return Home