INHERITANCE OF GREAT DANE COAT COLOR
By Jane Chopson
Revised September, 1992
This paper provides
the reader with some fundamentals of coat color
genetics and clarifies the meanings of some often used genetic terms. It will
be presented in three parts: Part I deals with the basics of genetics; Part II,
the basics of coat color inheritance; and Part III,
coat color genetics and its application to a breeding
program.
PART I
A single animal cell
is the structure in which life begins. All living things are composed of cells
which start the life cycle as a single cell, and
through a process of cell division and specialization, the organism is formed.
The dog reproduces by producing germ cells (gametes), sperm (male) and
eggs (female), which fuse to give rise to a single fertilized egg cell
(zygote). The zygote then grows and divides to form the embryo. The information
to reproduce a complex many-celled animal is thus transmitted through two
cells, sperm and egg.
The cell is made up
of a cell wall inside of which is found cytoplasm and a nucleus. Within the
nucleus are contained the thread-like structures known as the chromosomes. It
is the chromosomes which carry the genetic material. They are arranged in
pairs, one member of each pair being derived from each parent. The dog has 78
chromosomes (diploid number) in each cell with the exception of the sperm and
egg cells which have only 39 chromosomes (haploid number), one from each pair.
Hence when the sperm and egg fuse, the zygote will again have the diploid
number of chromosomes, 78. The chromosomes contain DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid),
RNA (Ribonucleic Acid) and protein. A gene is a particle on the chromosome
which provides hereditary information and is made up of DNA. A gene can be thought
of as a set of coded instructions or blueprints. In order to understand how DNA
carries the genetic code, it is necessary to look at the structure of the
nucleic acid molecule. Watson and Crick theorized the structure was that of a
double helix. A double helix might be compared to two bedspring-like structures
linked together. They stuggested
sugar phosphate units forming two long chains. The chains are linked to
each other by a series of nitrogen bases: Adenine, Thymine, Cytosine and
Guanine; these chains forming the double helix. Adenine is always linked to
Thymine and Cytosine is always linked to Guanine. Information is coded in each
gene in a specific form or sequence of the four kinds of nitrogen bases within
DNA. The sequence differs in each gene and thereby distinguishes one gene from
another. Genes produce chemical compounds called enzymes. These enzymes govern
the embryological development and growth of all structures in the body.
There are two types
of cell division. The first is MITOSIS, a process in which the somatic
cells (those other than gamete) of an organism are formed. In mitosis there is
a daughter cell produced which received an exact copy of the diploid number of
chromosomes in the mother cell. It is this method by which the somatic cells of
the body reproduce.
The second kind of
cell division is MEIOSIS, a process in which there is a reduction in the
number of chromosomes from the diploid number to the haploid number. It is this
type of cell division by which sperm and eggs are produced. The processes of
producing sperm and eggs by meiosis are known as SPERMATOGENESIS and OOGENESIS,
respectively.
Among the 39 pairs
of chromosomes, there is one pair which determines the sex of the animal. This
pair is known as the SEX CHROMOSOMES. They differ significantly from
each other in size and shape, one being called the X chromosome and the other
being called the Y chromosome. Males carry and X and a Y; females carry two Xs.
Hence it is the sire who determines the sex of the puppies because his sperm
can contain and X or a Y chromosome. The female’s egg cells can only carry an
X. Therefore, if an X carrying sperm fertilizes the egg, the puppy is a female.
The remaining 38
pairs of chromosomes are known as autosomes. Each one
is similar to its partner is size, shape, and function. In a pair of
chromosomes, each one is known as being HOMOLOGOUS to its partner.
Homologous chromosomes have the same gene sites or locations on them. These
gene sites are known as the gene loci and only # gene may be found each loci on a chromosome. Alternate forms of a gene which occupy
the same loci on homologous chromosomes and affect the same trait are known as
alleles. If these two genes are the same, then the animal is said to be HOMOZYGOUS
for that pair. If they are different, then the animal is said to be HETEROZYGOUS
for that pair. If he is heterozygous, one gene may be DOMINANT to the
other. Dominant genes mask RECESSIVE genes. An example of this would
occur with the inheritance of tail shape. A dog who is
homozygous for the dominant straight tail gene (SS) bed to a homozygous
recessive screw tail (SS) would produce all heterozygous puppies (Ss). GENOTYPE
of the puppies, the genetic make up, would be Ss while their PHENOTYPE,
outward physical appearance, would be that of a straight tail dog. Since the
straight tail gene is dominant to the recessive screw tail gene, the straight
tail gene will mask the screw tail and the puppies will have straight tails. It
should be noted that one gene was derived from each parent. The possible
phenotypes and genotypes of puppies may be figured by the following method:
|
|
EXAMPLE I |
EXAMPLE II |
EXAMPLE III |
|
PARENTS |
SS x ss |
Ss x ss |
Ss x ss |
|
POSSIBLE GAMETES |
S s |
S or s s |
S s |
|
|
s s S Ss Ss S Ss Ss |
s s S Ss Ss s ss ss |
s s s ss ss s ss ss |
|
OFFSPRINGS: Phenotype Genotype |
4/4 Straight tailed 4/4 Ss |
½ Straight, ½ Screw Tail ½ Ss ss |
4/4 Screw tail 4/4 ss |
The expected
outcomes are based on an infinite number of breedings.
Although SS x ss and ss x ss breedings would always result
in the expectd ration, the Ss x ss
could deviate from the expected 50:50 ratio if too small a sampling were made.
It is the same as tossing a coin for heads or tails. If we toss it a million
times, we would probably get close to the expected 50:50 ratio, and if we toss
it an infinite number of times, we would get the expected ratio. But if we just
tossed a coin twice, we might not get what we should have theoretically based
on the small sample. It should also be noted that certain cases of deviance may
be accounted for by mutation. MUTATION is a spontaneous genetic change
or may be induced by such things and radiation, temperature change, chemicals
or other causes.
PART II
Dr. Clarence C.
Little, in his book THE INHERITANCE OF COAT COLOR IN DOGS, mentions the
following allelic series concerned with the inheritance of coat color. Remember, a dog will carry two genes from each of
the series, one on each chromosome, with each one being derived from each
parent. They may be the same gene (homozygous) or they may be two different
genes (heterozygous). The G, P, and R gene loci have been omitted from
discussion since almost all Great Danes are homozygous for one gene in each
series and so are not important in determining different colors
in Great Danes. In the G series, they are homozygous for the recessive
non-greying gene (gg) and in the P series homozygous
for the recessive non-pink eyed dilution gene (pp). In the R series they are
probably homozygous for the recessive non-roan gene (rr). It should be noted, however, that there is some
question involving the R genes and there is a slight possibility that Merle or
Harlequin Danes may carry the R gene.
|
A SERIES; INFLUENCES THE DISTRIBUTION OF DARK AND
LIGHT PIGMENT IN ORDER OF DOMINANCE |
|
As |
Allows
distribution of dark Brown or Black all over the body. |
|
aw |
Produces the wile
Agouti type of color. |
|
ay |
Restricts dark or
Black and produces Tan, Fawn or Sable |
|
at |
Produces Bi-color (Black & Tan, etc.) |
A further gene in
this series is postulated by some writers, but not by Little.
It would restrict the dark to a Saddle –pattern.
|
B SERIES |
In order of
dominance:
|
B |
Black |
|
b |
Liver or Chocolate |
PRESENT IN GREAT
DANES: B
and b (Little does not include "b" in Great Danes but evidence is
clear as to its presence).
|
C SERIES |
In order of
dominance:
|
C |
Full depth of
pigment |
|
cch |
Chinchilla, reduces the Red or Yellow
pigment more than the Black. |
|
ca |
Complete Albinism |
PRESENT IN GREAT
DANES: C
and possibly cch. Little does not include cch in Great Danes, but it may
account for extremely pale Fawns who are not dilutes.
|
D SERIES |
In order of
dominance:
|
D |
Allows dense
pigmentation |
|
d |
Dilution of
pigment |
PRESENT IN GREAT
DANES: D
and d
|
E SERIES |
In order of
dominance:
|
Em |
Black Mask |
|
E |
Allows formation
of dark pigment (Black or Brown) over the entire body |
|
ebr |
Brindle |
|
e |
Restricts dark
pigmentation to Red, Orange, Yellow |
PRESENT IN GREAT
DANES: Em and E and ebr.
There is a slight possibility that ee exists in a few
Great Danes. This could possibly account for the production of Blacks from
"Fawn to Fawn." If the two dogs involved were ayayEmEm
x AsAsee, all AsayEme would result and
they would be Black.
|
M SERIES |
In order of
dominance:
|
M |
Produces irregular
patches of dark pigment on a lighter background of the same pigment.
Homozygous MM is semi-lethal and animals are often blind and/or deaf and/or
sterile. They are usually mostly White. The M genes also tend to add
White |
|
m |
Non-Merle |
PRESENT IN GREAT
DANES: M
and m.
|
S SERIES |
In order of
dominance:
|
s |
Solid coat; no
White except possibly a small amount on the chest and toes. |
|
si |
Irish spotting;
White on one or more of the following: muzzle, forehead, feet, neck, tail
tip, chest, belly and/or throat. |
There is some
confusion is distinguishing animals in this series phenotypically
due to the action of plus and minus modifying factors (various genetic factors
independent of the main gene). There are also frequently situations of
incomplete dominance occurring in this series. This is a quantitative, not a
qualitative series.
PRESENT IN GREAT
DANES: S
and si and possible Sp.
|
T SERIES |
In order of
dominance:
|
T |
Ticking; produces
small flecks of color, ticking is not visible at
birth |
|
t |
Non-ticking |
PRESENT IN GREAT
DANES: T
and t.
There must also be
at least one other gene, and possibly more, to account for the difference
between Merles and Harlequins. Little attempts to explain the difference by an
interaction of M and sp and sw
genes, but this seems to be an inadequate explanation.
Burns and Fraser suggest that Harlequins are EEMm and
that Merles are EeMm or EebrMM,
but this would also seem unlikely, since the occurrence of eemm
or ebrebrmm dogs is infrequent
in Merle x Merle breedings and even more so because
it doesn not explain how two Harlequins can produce a
Merle, which they frequently do. Dr. Bagala, in 1966,
hypothesized another gene series which he titled the W series (not to be
confused with the W series of Iljin. This seems to
possibly provide an explanation for the genetic difference between Harlequin
and Merle. This is only a possibility, not yet a proven theory.
|
W SERIES (PROPOSED) |
In order of
dominance:
|
W |
Clears ground Grey
color of Merle to White, Harlequin. Lethal in the homozygous
state, and death occurs in the embryo. |
|
w |
Non-clearing gene. |
Since homozygous W
is lethal, all Harlequins must be Ww and all Merles
must be ww. This explains why we get no true breeding
Harlequins. There is a question as to what effect W would have on Fawns,
Brindles, Blues and Blacks, but for the time being we will assume they could be
ww or Ww and be phenotypically the same.
Even if Bagala’s hypothesis is correct and we assume that the S
series is quantitative in nature and that a number of situations of incomplete
dominance exist, there are still some unexplained problems. The reports of
Harlequin puppies from Merle to Merle breedings
cannot be accounted for within Bagala’s theory.
Schaible and Brumbaugh
in 1976 indicated their data suggested Harlequins were accounted for by an
additional allele in the M series and gave it a provisional symbol of Mh. They further suggest that the gene
responsible for Harlequins is subject to a high degree of germinal and somatic
mutation. Spontaneous germinal mutation to different alleles within the M
series could account for the colors produced by
Harlequin breedings and Merle breedings
as well as the absence of "true breeding" Harlequins.
Clearly, there is a
need for further data collection and analysis of breeding within the Harlequin
family to clarify the genetic difference between the Harlequin and the Merle.
|
SOME SAMPLE GENOTYPES |
PHENOTYPE |
|
AsayBBCCDdEEmmSSww AsAsBbCCDDEmEmmSSww AsAsbbCCDDEEmmSSww ayayBBCCDDEmEmmmSSww AsAsBBCCDDEEMmsisiWw ayayBBCCddEmEbrmmSSww |
Black Black Liver or Chocolate Masked Fawn Harlequin Masked Dilute Brindle |
Remember, for one
phenotype, there can be many genotypes.
Below is a list of
what a dog must carry to be a certain color. It is
not what it would necessarily be best for it to carry as far as a breeding
program is concerned. For example: a dog may carry one Liver recessive and
still phenotypically be a good color,
but he might not be a good dog to use in a breeding program. All dogs carry two
genes in each series.
When the terms
"Fawn, Brindle, Blue, Black and Harlequin" are used, they refer to
the colors as described in the Great Dane Standard,
unless otherwise noted.
|
As |
All Blacks, Blues,
Harlequins, and Merles must have one or two. |
|
ay |
All Fawns and
Brindles must have two. Blacks, Blues, Harlequins and Merles may carry one
recessively. |
|
B |
All Blacks, Blues,
Harlequins, Merles, Fawns and Brindles must have one or two. |
|
b |
All Chocolates or
Livers (dogs with liver nose) must have two. Blacks, Blues, Harlequins,
Merles, Fawns, and Brindles may carry one recessively. |
|
C |
All Fawns and
Brindles must have one or two. Blues, Blacks, Harlequins and Merles may have
none, one or two. |
|
cch |
Possibly some of
the very light background Fawns and Brindles have two. Blues, Blacks,
Harlequins, and merles may carry none, one or two. |
|
D |
All Blacks,
Harlequins, Fawns, Brindles and Merles with Black pigment may have one or two. |
|
d |
All Blues, dilute
Fawns, dilute Brindles, dilute Harlequins and dilute Merles must have
two. All non-dilute dogs may carry one recessively. |
|
Em |
All masked
Fawns must have at least one. Most masked Brindles have one, but there is
some confusion since the striping can tend to give the appearance of a mask
when genotypically there is no masking gene.
Blacks, Blues, Harlequins and Merles may have none, one or two. |
|
E |
All completely maskless Fawns have two. Brindles can have none or
one. Blacks, Blues, Harlequins and Merles could carry none, one or two.
Masked Fawns may carry one recessively. |
|
ebr |
All Brindles must
have at least one. Blues, Blacks, Harlequins and Merles can carry none, one
or two. Fawns can’t carry any. It must be remembered that Em
is dominant to ebr but Em only affects a small area on the dog, and ebr expresses itself on the rest of the dog.
Hence, a Emebr
animal will be a masked Brindle, providing, of course, that the genes in the
other series also allow this. |
|
M |
Whites generally
carry two; all Harlequins and Merles have one. Many who carry two
are defective. |
|
m |
Blacks, Blues,
Fawns and Brindles all carry two. Harlequins and Merles carry one. |
In the S series
there is considerable confusion, since plus and minus modifying
factors (various genetic factors independent of the main gene) are operative.
So there is some overlap between the genes. There are also frequent
fluctuations due to incomplete dominance.
|
S |
All Fawns,
Brindles, Blues and Blacks must have two. Merles may have none, one or two.
Harlequins can have none or one. |
|
si |
Harlequins and
Merles can carry none, one or two. Fawns, Brindles, Blacks and blues
generally carry none. |
|
sp |
Same as si, if present in Danes. |
|
T |
All ticked
Harlequins and Merles have one or two. |
|
t |
All non-ticked
dogs have two. |
|
W |
(Proposed) All
Harlequins have one. Assume that Fawns, Brindles, Blacks and Blues could have
one undetected. |
|
w |
All Danes must
carry one. Merles must carry two. Fawns, Brindles, Blacks and Blues could
have two. |
PART III
Since all ethical
dog breeders strive to produce as few mis-marked
puppies as possible and to produce as many correctly marked as possible, there
is a need to understand and apply the knowledge of color
inheritance to a breeding program. The breeder should have clearly in mind
which colors he wishes to produce and strive to
upgrade their quality. All breeders should be concerned with the upgrading of
all five colors. In order to do this, he must not
only know the phenotype of his animal, but also the genotype. To have a truly
effective breeding program, one must take into account genotype rather than
just phenotype. A Black is a Black is a Black is not the case. There are many
genetically different Blacks and they must be treated as such.
If a breeder is to
produce correctly marked offspring, he must know which genes to avoid when
breeding. Below are some basic guidelines to produce correctly marked dogs.
Remember, only color is being considered here. It
should be noted, however, that color is only worth 8
points out of a hundred in our Standard, and it would be wrong to look only at color and forget the rest of the dog.
Sometimes, for the
sake of upgrading conformation in a particular color,
otherwise undesirable crossing might be done. However, if attempted they should
only be attempted by the experienced breeder who has a thorough knowledge of color genetics and is willing to cull, control and test-breed
the dogs he is working with until the undesirable color
gene or genes have been eliminated from his new, hopefully upgraded, stock. The
following is an outline for an ideal situation and would only be completely
practical if all colors were of equal quality and
popularity.
FAWNS:
Since it is
undesirable to have dilute Fawns or Fawns with considerable white, or Merle
Fawns, it would be best not to breed Fawns to Blues, Harlequins or Merles, or
to any other color which carries a dilution,
"d", White Spotting, "si or
sp", or a Merling, "M",
allele. They could safely be bred to Fawns, Brindles or Blacks who do not carry
those undesirable genes. These Fawns resulting from: Fawn x Brindle, Brindle x
Brindle, Fawn x Black, Brindle x Black and Black x Black, are just the same as
those from Fawn x Fawn breeding since they could not carry the dominant Brindle
or Black gene and still be Fawn. It might be noted that the old idea of Fawn x
Fawn over several generations washing out color is
not true, provided that well-pigmented Fawns are always selected.
BRINDLES:
Like Fawns,
dilution, white spotting and merling genes are to be
avoided. Brindles can be bred to Fawns, Brindles, and to Blacks which do not
carry those undesirable genes.
BLUES:
Fawn, brindle,
merle, and white spotting genes should be avoided. Hence, Blues should be bred
to Blues or Blacks not carrying those genes. It should be noted, however, that
Blue bred to Black from Black breeding only, and hence not carrying a dilution
gene, will yield only Blacks.
HARLEQUINS:
It is undesirable to
have fawn, brindle and dilution genes in Harlequins. Hence, Fawns, Brindles,
Blues and Blacks carrying fawn, brindle and blue dilution recessive must be
avoided in breeding Harlequins, if we are to attain the highest degree of
correctly marked offspring. If the proposed "W" is lethal in the
homozygous state, and MM is semi-lethal, we will never have true breeding
Harlequins since they would be MMWW. If they didn’t die in embryo, they could
be defective. Hence, we must realize there will probably always be a certain
number of Merles and mis-marked Blacks resulting from
breeding within the Harlequin family.
Since it is presumed
"W" is lethal in the homozygous state, it might be wisest to avoid
producing WW dogs. One must also keep in mind that MM is semi-lethal and hence
Harlequin to Harlequin breeding or Harlequin to Merle breeding may yield some
defectives also.
Let us look at some
results from harlequin, Merle and Black breeding. We will assume that WW is
lethal, MM is semi-lethal. These are theoretically what should result:
|
Phenotype |
Harle x Harle |
|
Genotype |
MmWw x MmWw |
|
Possible Gametes |
MW, Mw, mW, mw |
|
GAMETES |
MW |
Mw |
MW |
Mw |
|
MW |
MMWW |
MMWw |
MmWW |
MmWw |
|
Mw |
MMWw |
MMww |
MmWw |
Mmww |
|
MW |
MmWW |
MmWw |
MmWW |
MmWw |
|
Mw |
MmWw |
Mmww |
MmWw |
mmww |
|
MmWw |
Harlequin |
|
Mmww |
Merle |
|
Mmww |
Black |
|
MmWw |
Black |
|
MMww |
White |
|
MMWw |
White |
|
MmWW |
Lethal in embryo |
|
MMWW |
Lethal in embryo |
|
MmWW |
Lethal in embryo |
OFFSPRING:
|
Blacks |
3/16 |
|
Merles |
1/8 |
|
Dead in embryo |
1/4 |
|
White |
3/16 |
|
Harlequins |
1/4 |
|
Total
Acceptable Colors |
7/16 |
(Note: No
consideration is given to the amount of White on these Blacks and Harlequins, hence some may not be correctly marked.)
Harlequin (MmWw) to Merle (Mmww) by the same
method yields:
OFFSPRING:
|
Blacks |
1/4 |
|
Merles |
1/4 |
|
White |
1/4 |
|
Harlequins |
1/4 |
|
Total
Acceptable Colors |
1/2 (i.e. without
regard to white) |
Harlequin (MmWw) to Black (mmWw) by the same
method yields:
OFFSPRING:
|
Blacks |
3/8 |
|
Merles |
1/8 |
|
Dead in embryo |
1/4 |
|
Harlequins |
1/4 |
|
Total
Acceptable Colors |
10/16 (i.e.
without regard to white) |
Harlequin (MmWw) to Black (mmww) without W
gene:
OFFSPRING:
|
Blacks |
1/2 |
|
Merles |
1/4 |
|
Harlequins |
1/4 |
|
Total
Acceptable Colors |
12/16 (i.e.
without regard to white) |
White (MMWw) to Black (mmww) without W
gene:
OFFSPRING:
|
Harlequin |
1/2 |
|
Merles |
1/2 |
|
Total
Acceptable Colors |
1/2 (i.e. without
regard to white) |
It can be seen from
the above that 1/4 Harlequins is yielded from all these breedings,
except the White to Black breeding. There are obvious differences in the % of
Merles, Blacks and whites also produced and the number lost in embryo. It
should be noted that the fractions are what are conceived, not actually
whelped. In the breedings in which there is a loss of
puppies in embryo, there would be more than ¼ Harlequins actually whelped, but
only 1/4 Harlequins actually conceived.
BLACKS:
The Black Great Dane
cannot be treated without regard to its genotype and have only its phenotype
considered. Blacks should probably be divided into five groups as far as breeding
is concerned:
Since the
possibility of test breeding being done to determine whether or not a hidden
recessive gene is present has been mentioned, it might be of use to explain how
such breedings should be done. If, for example, we
had a Black from a black (DD) x Blue (dd) breeding,
there is no need to do a test breeding for the presence of the recessive
dilution gene, since one member of each gene pair is derived form each parents.
Hence, we know that the dog is Dd. But if the Black dog is Black from parents
who are "D?", we would do a test breeding to
determine the genotype of that Black offspring. Since he is Black, we know that
he is either DD or Dd. To determine which, we breed him to a Blue. If any Blue
(dd) puppies result, we can conclude he was Dd. But
if no dilute offspring result among a sufficient number of puppies, we can
probably conclude that he was DD. The same method can be used to test for any
recessive gene, i.e. be breeding a dominant back to a double recessive.
Copyright
1992 Jane Chopson. All rights reserved. Our thanks to the willingness to share this article for educational
purposes.